| 35 | 0 | 84 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的:前瞻性探究基于2020年美国放射学会(ACR)O-RADS超声分类标准,联合血清CA125、HE4评估卵巢—附件肿瘤良恶性的临床价值。方法:选取2024年本院163名患者(共183例肿瘤,20例为双侧肿瘤,143例为单侧肿瘤),术前以经阴道超声为主(必要时结合经腹部超声)进行O-RADS分类,检测血清CA125、HE4水平,以术后病理为金标准分析诊断效能。结果:183例肿瘤中良性肿瘤136例,恶性肿瘤47例。O-RADS单独诊断AUC为0.936(95%CI:88.6%~98.6%),灵敏度89.4%,特异度91.2%;CA125单独诊断AUC为0.740(95%CI:65.7%~82.3%),灵敏度76.6%,特异度71.3%;HE4单独诊断AUC为0.709(95%CI:61.1%~80.8%),灵敏度42.6%,特异度99.3%;三者联合时AUC为0.949(95%CI:90.3%~99.6%),灵敏度91.5%,特异度90.4%。结论:O-RADS单独或联合血清CA125、HE4对卵巢—附件肿瘤良恶性诊断效能高,具有临床推广价值。
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the clinical value of the 2020 American College of Radiology(ACR) ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system(O-RADS) ultrasound classification criteria in conjunction with serum CA125 and HE4 for discriminating benign from malignant ovarian-adnexal tumors. Methods: A total of 163 patients(with 183 tumors in total, including 20 cases of bilateral tumors and 143 cases of unilateral tumors) admitted to our hospital in 2024 were selected. Preoperative O-RADS classification was performed mainly using transvaginal ultrasound(with transabdominal ultrasound combined if necessary). The serum levels of CA125 and HE4 were detected, and the diagnostic efficacy was analyzed with postoperative pathology as the gold standard. Results: Among the 183 tumors, 136 were benign and 47 were malignant. For O-RADS alone, the area under the curve(AUC) was 0.936(95% CI: 88.6%~98.6%),with a sensitivity of 89.4% and a specificity of 91.2%. For CA125 alone, the AUC was 0.740(95%CI:65.7%~82.3%), with a sensitivity of 76.6% and a specificity of 71.3%.For HE4 alone, the AUC was 0.709(95%CI: 61.1%~80.8%), with a sensitivity of 42.6% and a specificity of 99.3%.When the three were combined, the AUC was 0.949(95% CI: 90.3%~99.6%), with a sensitivity of 91.5% and a specificity of 90.4%.Conclusion: O-RADS alone or combined with serum CA125 and HE4 has high diagnostic efficacy in distinguishing benign from malignant ovarian-adnexal tumors, and thus has clinical promotion value.
[1]中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会.卵巢恶性肿瘤诊断与治疗指南(2021年版)[J].中国癌症杂志, 2021,31(6):490-500.
[2]Siegel R L, Miller K D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2019, 69(1):7-34.
[3]蓝春燕,王雅卓,张师前.铂敏感复发性卵巢癌诊治中国专家共识(2023年版)[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2023, 39(9):935-942.
[4]王萍,洪波,郭鹏.血清多指标联合经阴道彩超对上皮性卵巢恶性肿瘤的研究[J].中国超声医学杂志, 2022,38(5):561-565.
[5]周安艳,胡蓉.卵巢-附件影像报告和数据系统在卵巢肿瘤诊断中的应用研究进展[J].浙江医学, 2024, 46(8):881-885.
[6]Andreotti R F, Timmerman D, Strachowski L M, et al. ORADS US risk stratification and management system:a consensus guideline from the ACR ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system committee[J]. Radiology, 2020,294(1):168-185.
[7]陈程,戴晴.美国放射学会卵巢-附件影像报告和数据系统超声风险分层与管理共识指南的解读[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(11):1051-1060.
[8]王稳,王兴国,刘淑娟,等.交界性卵巢肿瘤诊治中国专家共识(2022年版)[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2022, 38(12):1185-1194.
[9]陈小军,陈小祥,高庆蕾,等.卵巢癌早期筛查中国专家共识(2025年版)[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2025, 41(2):204-211.
[10]Zhang M, Cheng S, Jin Y, et al. Roles of CA125 in diagnosis, prediction, and oncogenesis of ovarian cancer[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2021, 1875(2):188503.
[11]何乐伟,王充,杨诗敏,等.血清CA125和HE4的动态变化在预测卵巢高级别浆液性腺癌无进展生存期方面的价值研究[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2024, 44(9):1207-1216.
[12]Calinescu G. Application of the new classification criteria in ovarian pathology(IOTA-O-RADS)[J]. Ro Med J,2021, 68(S6):85-90.
[13]宋海曼,何文,康睿君,等.卵巢-附件影像报告和数据系统在卵巢肿瘤良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J].首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(6):948-952.
[14]唐华宇. O-RADS对附件区肿块的诊断价值[J].影像研究与医学应用, 2024, 8(24):138-140.
[15]牛会坤.子宫内膜超声MV-Flow联合血清卵巢激素预测PCOS患者IVF-ET成功率的效能评估[J].影像科学与光化学, 2025, 43(4):60-67.
[16]袁艳,胡萍香,林燕秋,等.腹部超声联合DCE-MRI在卵巢瘤样病变中的诊断灵敏性分析[J].影像科学与光化学, 2023, 41(6):314-319.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R737.31;R445.1
引用信息:
[1]龙泉,戴青里,郭宝芝,等.O-RADS联合血清CA125、HE4评估卵巢—附件肿瘤良恶性的临床应用价值探讨[J].影像技术,2026,38(02):4-8.
基金信息:
云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目(2024J0840)
2025-08-20
2025
2025-09-27
2025
2025-09-22
1
2026-04-01
2026-04-01